Pages

May 26, 2014

, , ,

PROVOCATION - Turkish Fleet of Warships Violate Greek Waters, Sail To Cyclades, Seen in Rafina!

Not one, not two, but five Turkish war ships violated Greek territorial waters on Monday sailing throughout the Cyclades islands and sounding an alarm with our country's armed forces. According to reports, while taking part in  the navy exercises “Beyaz Firtina 2014″ the ships apparently began to cut off from the other ships and suspiciously began to enter into Greek territorial waters.

The Greek Ministry of Defence immediately dispatched several Greek war ships to the area to monitor them while two pairs of F-16s were also called to the scene in order to accompany the Greek fleet.

Specifically, the Turkish ships consisted of the frigate Kemal Reis, and four gunboats the Meltem, the Imbat, the Ruzgar, and the Firtina. Press reports said they moved north of the island of Naxos, then south of Paros and even travelled south-east off of Santorini island.

A report on defencenet confirmed these reports noting that several ships sailed to the northern Cyclades while the other half to the central area around the Cyclades.  Specifically the Kemal Reis sailed to the areas between Andros and Evia and followed the coastline of Attica. The ship was even visible from Rafina! It then moved south east and was said to be near the islands of Mykonos and Naxos.

The other ships sailed to the island of Naxos, then it passed by the island of Paros and finally made its way to Sifnos. Following this it moved northeast towards Attica and then changed its course and headed towards the southern Cyclades area.

Turkish F-16s covered their movements, while naval cooperation aircraft CN-235 apparently were supporting them electronically.

The Defence Ministry is on alert, while defencenet said that even Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras was briefed.

It is obvious that the Turkish ships are testing the Greek reaction to this obviously unprecedented provocation. This is the first time that Turkey has attempted such a move and such an escalation.

If there are any developments, HellasFrappe will update this article again.

Stay tuned Frappers!


,

Greeks Send Msg To Gov't at Elections - Results Won't Affect Stability - Tsipras Calls For Nat.Elections

The results of the European elections sent a range of messages. The results will not affect the government’s stability, it does however create a new dynamic, which will obviously depend on how Mr. Tsipras will manage or rather manipulate the results. SYRIZA’s slight victory changes things somewhat in the midterm and the ruling government -and particular the conservative New Democracy party - is starting to feel the pressure.

In short, the elections on Sunday and gave a balanced result. Greek citizens may have favored SYRIZA, keeping its leader Alexis Tsipras’s claim for power alive, but also showed him that he definitely has a long way to go in order to actually assume some type of power. The chap is certainly -and luckily for us- not ready for that.

Citizens showed the government that they are fatigued from all the austerity measures that were imposed on them from Brussels and conservatives made it clear that they are very disappointed for the coalition with PASOK, (and especially with ND's indirect support to its leader Evangelos The Large Venizelos). But on the overall, and despite what most "progressive" Leftists media journals are saying on Monday, Greek citizens recognized Samaras' efforts to put things in order and get the economy back on track.

This is probably why Samaras said that the government received their message during his speech on Sunday night, and expressed the satisfaction that voters rejected the change that SYRIZA was promoting.
     “I know that we had two difficult years. I went all over Greece. I listened to all citizens carefully. I know their problems . I know what and how it should be changed. And we will move quickly. As quickly as possible.”
The conservatives believe that they have time to make their moves in order to correct the results but at the same time they recognize that this time has been limited now because of SYRIZA’s slight lead in the Euro elections. In any case, Samaras has a series of political aces up his sleeves, but as far as the economic policy of the country is concerned, he has no choice but to commit to the agreements that were signed by the previous PASOK government with the lenders. For example, he has to proceed pretty soon to pension subsidiary cuts and he is also committed to proceed to next layoffs in the public sector.

With Greek society and the economy still in a fragile condition, the Prime Minister’s plans now are to focus on stabilization in an effort to prove that his promises of exiting the crisis are true.

Various press reports on Monday began predicting a cabinet reshuffle and are definitely rejecting scenarios of general election being held in the autumn. It is, however, clear that all mechanisms are proceeding under the assumption that the current parliament is most likely to remain in place until the Presidential elections in March, 2015.

We trust this scenario as well, since Samaras has already spoken of righting injustices, and let us not forget that Venizelos announced a party conference for October.

Speaking of Evanjello: The chap was jumping with glee on Sunday night because he managed to mass 8 percent of the vote. At a press conference following the elections he told journalists that Tsipras' “blackmail”, and request for a referendum on the national strategy “was clearly rejected” by the Greek people and he based this opinion on the combined results of European, municipal and regional elections.

Tsipras, on the other hand is in another dimension altogether. He spoke about the need to establish a wider political alliance which would be able to win the next elections and obviously to do so he needs some time.

On Monday President of the Republic Karolos Papoulias received Tsipras, congratulating him on his party’s first-place result in Sunday’s EuroParliament elections.

After the meeting Tsipras warned Samaras against implementing new memorandum, salary cuts, layoffs and auctioning public assets, as well as appointing a new Governor of the Bank of Greece and a new EU Commissioner, as these appointments will be binding for the country in the years to come.

He also spoke about a serious political upset and underlined that this upset is evident not only as a result of SYRIZA lead in Sunday’s European elections but also because the parties of the government coalition lost 11 percentage points compared with the 2012 results. Tsipras said that this is a major disharmony and added that no one has the right to make crucial decisions that can be binding for the Greek people in the years to come, noting that the present parliament cannot elect a President.

The government’s response was immediate via its spokesman Simos Kedikoglou who stated that:
     “Tsipras was unable to bring early elections upon us, did not convince the electorate of the “overthrow” he envisaged and proceeds to unprecedented institutional aberrations: The people were asked to vote for a European parliament, not for the country’s administration. Another diversion is the threats he flings towards the government in the lines of “they should not even consider… to govern”!
Is he insisting on early national elections or is he trying to cause anarchy? Or both?”.

Venizelos also attacked the manner in which Tsipras approached the President because according to him it brought the latter in an extremely difficult position, "by having him listen to an unconstitutional proposal, which misrepresents the parliamentary system in Greece, the Constitution, and the country”.

The surprise was the rise of the popularity of the Golden Dawn party. As it shows, a considerable number of people completely ignored the bombardment of revelations that spoke of unproven criminal actions and they rewarded them by sending three of their MPs to the Europarliament.

They also emerged as the third political force in Greece but also in 28 of the 56 constituencies in the country. Specifically, Golden Dawn received 9.41%, of the vote, or approximately 1.4% more than that of Evanjello's PASOK/Elia party. In the state of Laconia they scored the highest percentage getting almost 15.54% of the vote, but that is not all. They also did quite well in northern Greek regions such as historical Pella, Imathia, Kastoria, Kilkis, Thessaloniki, Pieria and Evros. In Southern Greece they also did well in Corinth, Argolida and even in Attica.

The fact that Golden Dawn came third caused negative comments in Greece and abroad, with each party expressing their dislike and sadness for the popular endorsement of an organization whose leaders are in jail and face criminal offences.

The electoral presence of the Golden Dawn is associated with the trend of Euroscepticism and right wing – nationalist movements throughout Europe that got high percentages in the European elections.

Following the announcement of the results, GD’s spokesman, Elias Kassidiaris, expressed his party's gratitude to the Greek people but at the same time lashed out at Samaras as well as Tsipras.
     "“They imprison us, muzzle us and slander us because they are afraid of us. The people spoke and now the demand is clear: The legitimacy and constitutional order must be restored immediately. To restore the sovereignty of the people and the representatives of the nation, the members of the Golden Dawn to exercise again free their parliamentary duties."
The Independent Greeks party did not do that well at all since it saw its share of the vote more than halved since the June 2012 general election from 7.51 pct to just 3.45 pct. On Monday it announced that it is going to convene on Wednesday to discuss the party’s European elections result at a meeting that is going to be chaired by party leader Panos Kammenos and will be followed by a meeting of the party’s Executive Bureau.

Speaking to the state news agency ANA-MPA, Kammenos said he was troubled by his party’s losses and intended to hold an “open conference” – sometime in September – in an effort to unite “anti-memorandum patriotic forces”. According to his calculations the party lost some 200,000 votes since the 2012 elections, while smaller parties had gained some 450,000 votes. Some of those ‘lost’ votes, according to him, went to SYRIZA and Golden Dawn but others went to smaller parties of the right, such as the Union for the Homeland and the People, which had not gained a sufficient percentage of the vote to exercise influence but constituted a “serious political force” when combined.

He said the Independent Greeks would extend an invitation to these parties to cooperate at the planned conference.

DIMAR on the other is ready for a funeral. Its leader Fotis Kouvelis on Monday launched a round of meetings with leading party officials in order to assess his party's weak performance at the elections.

(Try getting rid of Maria Reppousi Mr. Kouveli... Maybe then you can come back with 3-4 percent of the vote).

In all, the outcome of Sunday's elections was friendly to the markets, since it did not disturb political stability, even if the performance of the governing New Democracy party were somewhat disappointing. This is what Nomura said in an announcement on Monday noting that the election results were in line with one of the three scenarios analyzed last week. At the same time it characterizes the low rate of the New Democracy party as raising some concern, since it shows that the party base remains weak, despite the nature of “relaxed voting” that European elections usually have.

Signed
HellasFrappe


, ,

Anti-Hellenism in the United States - Part l

The story of Anti-Hellenism in the United States is one that is heavily intertwined with the country’s history of Nativism and Nordic Supremacy. It is a tale which begins in the early 20th century as an influx of immigrants began to come to the country from Southern and Eastern Europe. This increase in new immigrants led to some within America’s elite, specifically lawyers and academics, to begin expounding theories of scientific racism, which eventually resulted in the rise of Nativist organizations and the birth of an American Eugenics movement [1].

Contributed to HellasFrappe
By Ioannis Fidanakis
ethniki-epanastasi

Funded by various corporate foundations, such as the Carnegie Institution and the Rockefeller Foundation [2], American Eugenists would help to found organizations such as the Immigration Restriction League [1]. These Nativist organizations would work to prevent “inferior races” from entering the United State and “polluting” the American gene pool. According to them, Greeks and other Southeastern Europeans were racially inferior, and a threat to the Anglo-Saxon purity of White America [1]. In many ways, it was directly due to Southern and Eastern European immigrants that the United States began passing anti-immigration laws, such as the Immigration Act of 1924 [3], and created a hierarchy of nationalities [4].

What is Nordicism and how is it relevant to Anti-Hellenism

For Greek-Americans, Nordicism presents itself as one of many racist philosophies whose ideological core emanates Anti-Hellenism. Many of the first manifestations of anti-Greek behavior in the United States can be seen as a direct result of the popularity and influence of Nordicism in American society. “Nordicism”, says Professor Anthony Gregor, “involves the belief that men of the ‘Nordic Race’ – tall, slender, fair-skinned, blond, blue-eyed, narrow-faced, narrow-nosed, long-headed individuals- are qualitatively superior to the remainder of mankind. They are the creators of civilization, and their passing marks the passing of civilization” [5]. Nordicism, commonly identified in the United States as merely “White Supremacy”, is actually the racial theory that the “Nordic Race” alone constitutes a master race [6]; and thereby, is superior from all other races, as well as other subgroups within the greater Caucasiod or “White Race”. Therefore, “Nordids” are seen as “pure” and true contenders to the phrase “White”.

In the United States, the primary proponent of Nordicism in early 20th century was eugenicist Madison Grant. Author of the popular book, The Passing of the Great race [7], Grant supported a version of Nordicism, which fit within the many different racial philosophies of his time. Like others he divided humanity into three distinct races: Caucasiods, Negroids, and Mongoloids, and further divide Caucasiods into Nordics, Alpines, and Mediterraneans. In his theory, Alpines were the most inferior of the three Caucasiod subraces while Nordics were the superior. The main difference between his version of Nordicism and other types popular in Europe was his rejection of the “Nordic Migration Theory”, as an explanation for Greco-Roman Civilization. Instead, he supported an equally ridiculous claim that Greco-Roman Civilization was the result of the indigenous element mixing with a Nordic one and founding their civilization on Nordic ideas.

The Greek American experience with Nordicism and Anglo-Conformity

"White," which nowadays includes anyone of European origin, was then reserved for people of Anglo-Saxon and Nordic stock. Greeks were considered to be of mixed race, mongrels genetically inferior to their allegedly pure ancestors of ancient times and, therefore, incapable of ever approaching their accomplishments. Inasmuch as these writers saw the Greeks as inferior and not white, and despised them for this, their behavior was clearly racist. -- E.D. Karampetsos. Nativism in Nevada: Greek Immigrants in White Pine County

An Essential chapter in the story of racial bigotry in American society, the Greek-American experience, is often left out. The days of being deemed the ‘scum of Europe’ and ‘unfit for citizenship’ [8] or simply called ‘filthy’ [9] are all but forgotten. Somehow the Greek-American psyche has blocked out any memory of its experience with racial discrimination and instead has created an illusionary memory of a painless immigration experience. However, the truth is that Greeks were never welcomed with open arms by Anglo-Saxon establishment. In the early days, Greek immigrants were constantly harassed by organizations, such as the Ku Klux Klan because they were viewed as ‘mongrelized members of a once great Nordic nation’ [10].

For many Greek immigrants, direct and indirect policies of Anglo-Conformism would make them twice victimized. Newly immigrated Greeks often surrendered their identity and integrity due to pressure to conform to the Anglo-dominated notions of “American” and “White”. Thus, a process was born of becoming more “Anglo” than the Anglo-Americans, in order to survive and succeed in American Society. As a result, some Greeks Anglicized their names while others refrained from speaking Greek or teaching it to their children. Many willing committed a form of ethnic suicide, sacrificing their ethnic heritage in order to be reborn as Anglicized Americans for social and economic security [10] [11].

Violence and Persecution in the 1900s

The first documented acts of anti-Greek behavior would be witnessed in 1907 in the form of violent riots, which befell the Greek community of Roanoke, Virginia [10], and the 1909 passing of anti-Greek legislation, which was directly aimed at the Greek community living in Newport, Rhode Island [21]. These two events, however, were just a taste of things to come. Throughout the early 20th century, Greek-Americans would suffer racial discrimination and economic intimidation at the hands of Nativist groups across the country.

The extent of intolerance that early Greek immigrants were forced to endure can be summed up by two anti-Greek riots, the first in Nevada 1908 and the second in Nebraska 1909. Although neither riot was the first of its kind in the United States, both are well documented and perfect examples of the racist nature of these attacks towards the Greek community.

The first incident took place in the Census-designated Place (CDP) of McGill, located in White Pine County, Nevada. The match, which ignited the violence, was the shooting of Constable Sam Davis by Antonis Vasilopoulos. Nativist reports claim that Constable Davis, a known anti-Greek, was in McGill searching for stolen lumber when the incident occurred. While local Greek reports, claim the Constable had come to harass the Greeks for building a stable.

An ensuing argument resulted, in which the Constable pulled his gun and shot at Antonis. In court, Davis claimed that he came upon Vasilopoulos sawing lumber and “recognized” it to be the stolen lumber in question. While questioning Vasilopoulos, the defendant pulled a gun and shot the constable unprovoked. However, Vasilopoulos testified that it was the Constable that fired first, wounding a horse, thus forcing him to shoot back in self-defense.

As a result of the encounter, Davis fled the scene. What happen next was reported at the time by the Tonopah Sun as, “A serious time bordering on riots has been the experience of Ely for several days with the Greek population of the district” [10]. Davis eventually rounded up a posse and pursued Vasilopoulos. At least one man, Dimitris Kalampokas, was murdered during the witch-hunt. Reports claim Yardmaster James A. Smith and group of men hunted down Kalampokas who was hiding from the mob. When found, he was commanded to surrender. Kalampokas refused and was shot several times. Vasilopoulos and several witnesses eventually would be arrested.

Local media kept tensions high, with claims of a “Greek Revolt” while rumors of a Greek “Black Hand” society spread. Tensions grew so much that, on January 22, 1908, the local paper reported: “Loaded into two box cars, herded together by armed guards, nearly a hundred Greeks passed last night in Ely waiting to be transported to some other points, most probably to Cobre. This will be done it states, this morning” [10]. The undesirable Greeks were rounded up and asked to pay for their own expulsion. The Nevada Northern Railway refused to haul them for free, and finally those rounded up were released. Many left, of their own will the next day, no longer feeling safe in White Pine County.

The second and perhaps even worse act of anti-Greek violence to befall the Greek American Community would be the Greek Town Riot of South Omaha on February 21, 1909. The New York Times reported on the violence, stating the entire Greek neighborhood was burned down while the Greek population of the town was expelled [13]. The entire ordeal began two days earlier on the 19th when John Masourides [14] was arrested by Edward Lowery, without provocation while taking English lessons from a local woman. The story goes that during transport to the local jailhouse; Masourides pulled out a gun and killed officer Lowery [15].

Two days after the shooting, two state legislators and a local attorney called for a mass town meeting. During which organizers went on racist and anti-Greek tirades, exploiting tensions and raising emotions against Greeks [13]. The mob eventually grew and marched on the South Omaha Jail, forcing police to transport the prisoner to the main Omaha jail. Unable to lynch Masourides, the mob turned on Greek Town itself.

The mob of 3,000 [13] descended upon the ethnic enclave looting homes and businesses. Men, women, and even children were beaten while the entire enclave was burned to the ground. In the end, five people suffered gunshot wounds; eleven were severely beaten [16], and one young Greek boy was killed [17]. Within a few days, the local Greek community fled to places such as Council Bluffs, Sioux City, and Salt Lake City [18]. To make matters worse, a year later, local police took revenge against those remaining Greeks by lynching a young man named Nicholas Jimikas [14].

Anti-Greek Sentiment continues in the 1910s & 20s

The wave of anti-Greek discrimination across the United States would continue into the next several decades, with incident such as Gray’s Harbor, Washington in 1912 where Greek lumber workers were expelled from the area or the city ordinance of Pocatella, Idaho, which enforced segregated seating on Greeks in theaters and certain neighborhoods [12]. In places like Utah, at the end of the First World War, groups such as the American Legion would harass immigrant communities, especially the Greeks [19].

In the 1920s, the revival of the Ku Klux Klan would mean attacks on Greeks across the country. In Utah, Greeks would witness intense prejudice, such as one Magna Greek resident who had married an American woman, in response the Klan burned a cross in front of his store and his wife’s family home[19]. In Florida, the story of Chris Lochas demonstrates a typical strategy of the Klans towards Greeks. On July 8, 1921, three cars full of Klansmen drove out to Lochas’ restaurant. Three men entered his establishment and handed Lochas a letter, which read, “You are an undesirable citizen. You violate the Federal prohibition laws, the laws of decency, and you are a running sore on society. Several trains are leaving Pensacola daily. Take your choice, but don’t take too much time” [20].

Intimidation by the Klan in the form of boycotts and cross burnings were common place towards Greeks. In response to these growing racist attacks, organizations like the American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association were born.

Anti-Hellenism’s role in the 1920s anti-Immigration Laws

In 1907, a bipartisan special committee was formed by Congress, due to intense pressure from growing nativist organizations. Commonly referred to as the Dillingham Commission after its chairman, Senator William P. Dillingham, the United States Immigration Commission was organized to study the origins and consequences of recent immigrants to the United States. Concluding in 1911, the commission found that immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe posed a threat to American culture and society. A decision, which the commission was led to by individuals such as Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, a Republican Senator from Massachusetts and member of the Immigration Restriction League, who first proposed in 1909, the restriction of Southern and Eastern European immigration [22].

Rising pressure from Nativist organizations finally scored a major victory in 1921 for Nordicists in American immigration policy with the Emergency Quota Act. Intended to be temporary, the law added new features to immigration law, such as, numerical limits from Europe and a quota system for establishing those limits. The Act ultimately put into effect suggestions from the Dillingham Commission, thereby, favoring people of Northern Europe and discriminating against Southern and Eastern Europe.

Interestingly the action set no limits on immigration from Latin America.

The law eventually was superseded by the Immigration Act of 1924, which included both the National Origins Act and the Asian Exclusion Act. It is this federal law, which Alexander Makedon points to in his paper, The Social-Psychology of Immigration: The Greek-American Experience that makes Greeks the most discriminated European immigrant. “As a result of the new immigration law of 1924, Greek immigrants were restricted to the lowest immigration quota than any other European group. If past immigration quotas can be used as a ‘discrimination index’, it may be argued that since Greeks were allowed the lowest immigration quota, they were ‘officially’ discriminated against the most” [23].

Also referred to as the Johnson-Reed Act, after its two main architects, the vehemently racist Congressman Albert Johnson and Senator David Reed. The 1924 Act, limited the annual number of new immigrants from 3% to 2%, of any ethnicity's population already residing in the United States. However, the statistics used were according to the Census of 1890, rather than the Census of 1910. Supporters wished to establish a national identity, which favored native-born Anglo-Saxon Americans over Southern and Eastern Europeans [10], so to “maintain the racial preponderance of the basic strain on our people and thereby to stabilize the ethnic composition of the population” [24].

Conclusion

Today, Greek-Americans have no knowledge that Nativist groups such as the Klan burned crosses in front of Greek homes and boycotted Greek-owned businesses. Today, the very term Anti-Hellenism does not even warrant a Wikipedia page, let alone an actual discussion of its existence. Why have the experiences of others that suffered side by side or for similar reasons been deemed worthy of study and official classification and yet the Greek experience continues to be viewed as merely the “average Immigrate experience”?

How is it that concepts such as Anti-Italianism can spawn academic study, yet Anti-Hellenism is left to the world of blogs? How is it, that anti-immigration legislation such as the Immigration Act of 1924 can be seen as evidence of Italophobia and Anti-Semitism, but, not of Anti-Hellenism? How have other immigrant groups been able to use the same experiences and legislative acts to legitimize their own unique forms of discrimination while Greek-Americans have not? This need to white wash the Greek-American experience and paint a picture of a happy and willingly assimilated community does nothing but harm to the Greek-American psyche. In fact, it is a dishonor to the memory of martyrs like, Dimitris Kalampokas and Nicholas Jimikas, who died because they were Greek.

Sources:
  • [1] Margaret Quigley. The Roots of the I.Q.Debate
  • [2] Kühl, Stefan. The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism.
  • [3] Watson, James D.; Berry, Andrew. DNA: The Secret of Life.
  • [4] Lombardo, Paul; "Eugenics Laws Restricting Immigration,", Eugenics Archive
  • [5] Gregor, A James. "Nordicism Revisted"
  • [6] Gregor, A James. "Nordicism Revisted"
  • [7] Lindsay, J. A. "The Passing of the Great Race, or the Racial Basis of European History," The Eugenics Review
  • [8] Evangelis Tastoglou and George Stubos. Ryerson Polytechnical Institute, York University. The Pioneer Greek Immigrant in the United States and Canada(1880-1920s): Survival Strategies of a traditional family
  • [9] Evangelos Goulas. George Tselos: “Memories Guardian” on Ellis Island
  • [10] E.D. Karampetsos. Nativism in Nevada: Greek Immigrantsin White Pine County
  • [11] Alexander Makedon. The Social Psychology of Immigration: The Greek-American Experience.Chicago State University
  • [12] Dan Georgakas. The Greeks in America
  • [13] South Omaha mob wars on Greeks", The New York Times. February 21, 1909.
  • [14] Matthew Namee. Anti-Greek Riots in Omaha
  • [15] Officer Lowery also pulled out his service revolver and shot the Greek man."Edward Lowery", Policeman Down Memorial Page
  • [16] South Omaha Anti-Greek Riot over today. The Eugene Weekly Guard Thursday February 25, 1909
  • [17] Hill, J. (nd) “Interview: Helen Papanikolas.”
  • [18] Larsen, L. & Cotrell, B. The gate city: A history of Omaha, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
  • [19] Helen Z. Papanikolas. The Exiled Greeks
  • [20] Henry P. Fry. The Modern Ku Klux Klan. Small, Maynard & Company, 1922.
  • [21] Baker, Dr. Laura. Southern and Eastern EuropeanImmigrants: The Greek and Polish Experience
  • [22] Senate Vote #126 (May 15, 1924)". govtrack.us. Civic Impulse, LLC.
  • [23] Alexander Makedon. The Social Psychology of Immigration: The Greek-American Experience.Chicago State University
  • [24] Eckerson, Helen F. (1966). "Immigration and National Origins". Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. The New Immigration


Cardiovascular diseases increase during Greek financial crisis

Hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases increased during the Greek financial crisis, according to two studies that were recently released in Athens. The research was presented at the Heart Failure Congress 2014, held in Athens, Greece between May 17-20. The Congress was the main annual meeting of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Dr Alexios Samentzas said:
     "Greece plunged into an economic crisis in 2008 and since then there have been rises in unemployment, wage reductions and a fall in standard of living. Previous studies have shown that cardiovascular disease is more frequent during crises such as wars and natural disasters."
Dr Dimitra Papadimitriou said:
     "We noticed an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart attack in younger patients in the emergency room during the Greek financial crisis. Therefore, we decided to investigate whether there had been a real increase in cardiovascular diseases during the crisis."
The researchers retrospectively analysed all admissions to the cardiology department of Elpis General Hospital in Athens during two time periods. The first time period, 2003 to 2007, was defined as the pre-crisis period, while 2008 to 2012 was the crisis period.

Dr Samentzas said:
      "We chose 2008 as the start of the crisis because gross national product (GNP) markedly reduced that year. GNP is still at a lower level than it was prior to 2008 and unemployment has steadily gone up."
The researchers recorded admissions for heart attacks (also referred to as acute myocardial infarction) and AF, the commonest heart rhythm disorder. They examined the results in younger patients and those without social insurance, and looked to see if there were differences between men and women.

The cardiology department received 3 420 admissions during the pre-crisis period and 3 860 during the crisis period. During the crisis period the number of admissions for heart attacks rose in both sexes but the finding was only statistically significant in women. Admissions also increased in people under the age of 45 years, but again the result was only statistically significant in women.

Dr Papadimitriou, first author of the heart attack study, said:
      "Younger women are thought to be protected against heart disease because oestrogens have a favourable effect in the cardiovascular system. During menopause, women's ischemic heart disease risk equals men's their age due to an oestrogen deficit."
She continued:
      "During the financial crisis, women's natural protection against heart disease may have been cancelled because of stress, which is an important factor in the development of heart attacks. This could explain the greater number of admissions for heart attacks in women when the crisis occurred."
AF admissions increased significantly in both sexes during the crisis, with an even greater rise in women. The climb in admissions was also seen in patients under 60 years old, with men being more susceptible.

Dr Samentzas, who led the AF study, said:
       "Previous studies have shown links between depression, anxiety, stress and AF. It is likely that Greek people have become more stressed during the crisis as they have lost their jobs or had their salary decreased. The lack of money and decrease in quality of life may have led to happiness, self-esteem and satisfaction being replaced with distress, disappointment and anger. These negative emotions may have increased stress levels further and contributed to the rise in AF."
Admissions for AF doubled in patients (particularly women) with no social insurance while heart attack admissions increased in men and women without insurance, but the increase was statistically significant only in men. Dr Papadimitriou said: "We think there were more patients without social insurance during the crisis which is why there were more admissions. Unemployed people are less likely to pay for insurance."

She continued:
       "Our results highlight the importance of cardiovascular prevention during times of social distress. People with a lower quality of life due to the financial crisis tend to follow an unhealthy diet, have sedentary lifestyles and start or continue smoking as an escape from their problems."
Dr Samentzas concluded:
       "The upsurge in heart attacks and AF during the crisis are a wake-up call for doctors and health systems to advise patients how to live healthily and reduce their cardiovascular risk."
References
The 2 abstracts selected for this press release are presented during the same scientific session.

Please see the details of the session here: http://spo.escardio.org/SessionDetails.aspx?eevtid=68&sessId=13505&subSessId=3306

, ,

Greek State Council Says Closure of ERT Is “Constitutional & Legal”

The Greek State Council passed judgement that the sudden closure of public television and radio broadcasting service ERT on June 12, 2013 was “constitutional, legal and not in conflict with European legislation”. The ruling goes against an appeal that was launched by the federation of ERT employees (POSPERT).

From the very beginning HellasFrappe said that the government's decision to shut down ERT -which was a cesspool of corruption- was within legal lines. It was obvious that the government had done its homework when it shut it down.

Well it seems that the State Council’s ruling agrees with this argument. According to them ERT’s closure was deemed to be in-line with the law as the public broadcasting service had been included in the government reform plans since July 2011, which included “non-essential public bodies”. In an announcement the council added that there are no constitutional requirements for the operation of a public television and radio broadcasting service.

Moreover, the Council held that the aside from the financial needs that lead to the closure; the government had ensured that an interim service (EDT) had been established prior to the creation of a new public service (NERIT).

It should be also noted, however, that the State Council decision was not unanimous, with a minority of ten councilors arguing that the closure was against the Constitution and that the need for such a service was even greater when “private radio and television services continue to operate illegally to this day, while tolerated by the State”.


Patriarch and Pope sign common declaration in Jerusalem

The Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew and Pope Francis met on Sunday in Jerusalem in the framework of celebrating the 50th anniversary since the meeting of Athinagoras and Paul VI, when both the Orthodox and Catholic Churches lifted mutual excommunications and opened a new period of discussion.

On Sunday both religious leaders prayed together at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher and then they pledged to pursue ecumenical dialog in a common declaration. The relevant declaration calls for the protection of family, peace, the common good, the protection of the natural environment and of course religious liberty.

Patriarch Bartholomew and Pope Francis called for “communion in legitimate diversity” between both Churches and said that they "look forward in eager anticipation to the day in which we will finally partake in the Eucharist banquet”.


The articles posted on HellasFrappe are for entertainment and education purposes only. The views expressed here are solely those of the contributing author and do not necessarily reflect the views of HellasFrappe. Our blog believes in free speech and does not warrant the content on this site. You use the information at your own risk.